CapabilitiesSignature practice

Standards and Ecosystem Strategy

Shape the standard instead of reacting to it.

How do we shape the standard instead of reacting to it?

Why it matters now

93%
Of world exports potentially linked to technical regulations notified to the WTO, 2006–2015US International Trade Administration
Up to $5T
Value the metaverse could generate by 2030, contingent on interoperability across platformsMcKinsey & Company, Value creation in the metaverse
500+
Member organizations supporting the open content-provenance standard, with over 6,000 affiliatesC2PA, 2026

Our perspective

The standards being written now will decide which products interoperate, which claims are trusted and who sets the terms of a market. We put clients in the room, with positions that become adopted text.

Exhibit: from position to published standard
PositionA gap named in business termsProposalSchema and normative textReviewReviewer responses, alignment with regulationAdoptionMerged into the specificationPublicationC2PA 2.4, April 2026
  1. Position A gap named in business terms
  2. Proposal Schema and normative text
  3. Review Reviewer responses, alignment with regulation
  4. Adoption Merged into the specification
  5. Publication C2PA 2.4, April 2026

The path a position takes to become adopted text, as followed for the AI disclosure assertion. Source: C2PA; Hkdolts.

01

Influence is earned in the drafting room

The organizations that shape a standard are the ones that bring adoptable text, answer reviewers and stay through publication. Hkdolts took the AI disclosure assertion from proposal to the published C2PA 2.4 specification.

Source: C2PA Technical Specification 2.4, AI Disclosure

03

Visibility of the landscape is a strategic asset

With dozens of bodies working on overlapping specifications, the forum built a public register so adopters can see where to focus. Clients who read that landscape early choose the right seats and avoid the wrong fights.

Source: Metaverse Standards Forum, Launch of the Metaverse Standards Register

Proof points

  • Chair of the Metaverse Standards Forum Use Case Task Force, which reviews and publishes the use cases in the Forum’s open Use Case Register. Metaverse Standards Forum
  • Board member of the Metaverse Standards Forum and chair of its Standards Register.
  • Contributor to an approved Trust Over IP protocol (TRQP v2.0) and to the Global Standards Mapping Initiative for digital assets. Trust Over IP
  • Steering committee member of Trust Over IP, and co-chair of its Ecosystem and Governance Working Group.
  • Core architect of the AI disclosure assertion in the C2PA specification, taken from proposal to adopted text. C2PA

How we help clients

Five capabilities, each defined by what the client receives.

01

Standards positioning

The working groups where the client’s roadmap and the standard meet, and a plan to earn influence there.

What clients receive

  • A map of the bodies and groups that matter
  • A position and a participation plan
  • Adoption targets with a review cadence
02

Ecosystem representation

A fixed-fee route for founders into governance leadership and representation across standards bodies.

What clients receive

  • A seat and a voice without hourly advisory cost
  • Representation in the working groups that matter
  • Standing with the ecosystem’s decision makers
03

Specification development

Positions turned into normative text, schemas and reviewer responses, carried through to adoption.

What clients receive

  • Proposal text a working group can adopt
  • Technical review before publication
  • Responses that carry a proposal through review
04

Governance frameworks and conformance

Governance frameworks and principles, with conformance assessments that score how an ecosystem measures up.

What clients receive

  • A governance framework fit for the ecosystem
  • A scored conformance assessment
  • A path to machine-readable governance
05

Convening and strategic foresight

Convening series, task-force launches, community reviews and futures research that keep the client ahead of the agenda.

What clients receive

  • Convenings that bring standards bodies and policy makers together
  • Phased roadmaps for new task forces
  • Foresight on where the market is heading

Who we serve, the outcome and why Hkdolts

Who we serve

  • Standards-stage founders and scale-ups
  • Corporates with a stake in interoperability
  • Industry consortia and foundations
  • Public bodies convening around shared rules

The outcome

A recognized voice in the bodies that govern the market, and standards that reflect the client’s roadmap.

Why Hkdolts

  • Leadership and contributor roles across seven standards bodies
  • Board member and task-force chair in the forum for metaverse interoperability
  • Steering committee member and working-group co-chair in digital-trust governance

How we engage

A fixed-fee representation programme for founders, or a retainer for organizations shaping several standards at once.

Our impact

Selected work behind this practice.

Standards-stage founder programTechnology, media and telecommunications

What we didA fixed-fee route into governance leadership and representation across standards bodies

The impactFounders gain a seat without hourly advisory cost

Task-force launchTechnology, media and telecommunications

What we didCharter and a twelve-month roadmap in three phases for a new creator-identity task force

The impactThe task force started with scope, sequence and owners agreed

Governance framework reviewPublic sector and institutions

What we didA community review of a governance metamodel, with a path to a machine-readable edition

The impactThe framework has a dated plan to stabilize and evolve

Convening seriesPublic sector and institutions

What we didHosted for a standards forum working group

The impactStandards bodies and policy makers meet on shared governance questions

Related research

Published perspectives on the questions behind this practice.

All insights

Bring us the decision

Tell us where you stand. We will reply with how we would approach it.

From the United States to leadership teams worldwide, virtually or on site.

  1. 1
    FrameAgree the decision to be made and the evidence it requires.
  2. 2
    BaselineEstablish where the organization stands today.
  3. 3
    CommitAgree the scope, the model and the price.